TY - GEN
T1 - A Community-Aware Approach to Minimizing Dissemination in Graphs
AU - Zhang, Chuxu
AU - Yu, Lu
AU - Liu, Chuang
AU - Zhang, Zi-Ke
AU - Zhou, Tao
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledgements: This work was partially supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61673151, 61503110 and 61433014), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. LY14A050001 and LQ16F030006).
PY - 2017/8/3
Y1 - 2017/8/3
N2 - Given a graph, can we minimize the spread of an entity (such as a meme or a virus) while maintaining the graph’s community structure (defined as groups of nodes with denser intra-connectivity than inter-connectivity)? At first glance, these two objectives seem at odds with each other. To minimize dissemination, nodes or links are often deleted to reduce the graph’s connectivity. These deletions can (and often do) destroy the graph’s community structure, which is an important construct in real-world settings (e.g., communities promote trust among their members). We utilize rewiring of links to achieve both objectives. Examples of rewiring in real life are prevalent, such as purchasing products from a new farm since the local farm has signs of mad cow disease; getting information from a new source after a disaster since your usual source is no longer available, etc. Our community-aware approach, called constrCRlink (short for Constraint Community Relink), preserves (on average) 98.6% of the efficacy of the best community-agnostic link-deletion approach (namely, NetMelt+), but changes the original community structure of the graph by only 4.5%. In contrast, NetMelt+ changes 13.6% of the original community structure.
AB - Given a graph, can we minimize the spread of an entity (such as a meme or a virus) while maintaining the graph’s community structure (defined as groups of nodes with denser intra-connectivity than inter-connectivity)? At first glance, these two objectives seem at odds with each other. To minimize dissemination, nodes or links are often deleted to reduce the graph’s connectivity. These deletions can (and often do) destroy the graph’s community structure, which is an important construct in real-world settings (e.g., communities promote trust among their members). We utilize rewiring of links to achieve both objectives. Examples of rewiring in real life are prevalent, such as purchasing products from a new farm since the local farm has signs of mad cow disease; getting information from a new source after a disaster since your usual source is no longer available, etc. Our community-aware approach, called constrCRlink (short for Constraint Community Relink), preserves (on average) 98.6% of the efficacy of the best community-agnostic link-deletion approach (namely, NetMelt+), but changes the original community structure of the graph by only 4.5%. In contrast, NetMelt+ changes 13.6% of the original community structure.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/626774
UR - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-63579-8_8
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028466527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-63579-8_8
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-63579-8_8
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783319635781
SP - 85
EP - 99
BT - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
PB - Springer Nature
ER -