A comparative study of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) versus SCX-IMAC-based methods for phosphopeptide isolation/enrichment

Chee Sian Gan, Tiannan Guo, Huoming Zhang, Sal Kiang Lim, Siu Kwan Sze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Scopus citations

Abstract

Electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) has been introduced recently for phosphopeptide enrichment. Here we compared ERLIC with the well-established SCX-IMAC for identifying phosphopeptides in EGF-treated A431 cells. The ERLIC approach detected a higher number of phosphopeptides (17 311) than SCX-IMAC (4850), but it only detected 926 unique phosphopeptides compared to 1315 in SCX-IMAC. Only 12% unique phosphopeptides were common to both approaches, suggesting that more comprehensive phosphoproteomes could be generated by complementing SCX-IMAC with ERLIC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4869-4877
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Proteome Research
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • A431 carcinoma cells
  • EGFR signaling
  • ERLIC
  • IMAC
  • Phosphopeptide enrichment
  • SCX
  • WAX

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • Biochemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) versus SCX-IMAC-based methods for phosphopeptide isolation/enrichment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this