An Investigation of the Relationship between COMLEX-USA Licensure Examination Performance and State Licensing Board Disciplinary Actions

William L. Roberts, Gretta A. Gross, John R. Gimpel, Larissa L. Smith, Katie Arnhart, Xiaomei Pei, Aaron Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose Passing the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination of the United States (COMLEX-USA) serves as a licensing requirement, yet there is limited understanding between this high-stakes exam and performance outcomes. This study examined the relationship between COMLEX-USA scores and disciplinary actions received by osteopathic physicians. Method Data for osteopathic physicians (N = 26,383) who graduated from medical school between 2004 and 2013 were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression to assess the relationship between COMLEX-USA scores and placement into one of 3 disciplinary action categories relative to no action received, controlling for years in practice and gender. Results Less than 1% of physicians in this study (n = 187) had a disciplinary action(s). Controlling for all COMLEX-USA levels, years in practice, and gender, higher Level 3 scores were associated with significant decreased odds for all action categories: revoked licensed (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36, 0.72; P
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)925-930
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume95
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Investigation of the Relationship between COMLEX-USA Licensure Examination Performance and State Licensing Board Disciplinary Actions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this