Are the ecological effects of the “worst” marine invasive species linked with scientific and media attention?

Nathan Geraldi; Andrea Anton Gamazo; Catherine E Lovelock; Carlos M. Duarte

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215691

Are the ecological effects of the “worst” marine invasive species linked with scientific and media attention?

Nathan Geraldi, Andrea Anton Gamazo, Catherine E Lovelock, Carlos M. Duarte

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Non-native species are a major driver of environmental change. In this study we assessed the ecological impact of the

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	e0215691
Journal	PLOS ONE
Volume	14
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215691
State	Published - Apr 18 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1371/journal.pone.0215691

https://repository.kaust.edu.sa/bitstream/10754/631983/1/journal.pone.0215691.pdf

Cite this

@article{d6888c17e2a74f56809a88d9d9e2dcf3,

title = "Are the ecological effects of the “worst” marine invasive species linked with scientific and media attention?",

abstract = "Non-native species are a major driver of environmental change. In this study we assessed the ecological impact of the",

author = "Nathan Geraldi and {Anton Gamazo}, Andrea and Lovelock, {Catherine E} and Duarte, {Carlos M.}",

note = "KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01 Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology through baseline funding and funds and by the Tarek Ahmed Juffali Research Chair in Red Sea Ecology to C.M.D.",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0215691",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "14",

pages = "e0215691",

journal = "PLOS ONE",

issn = "1932-6203",