TY - JOUR
T1 - Can the Enterococcus faecalis identified in the root canals of primary teeth be a cause of failure of endodontic treatment?
AU - Cancio, Viviane
AU - Carvalho Ferreira, Dennis de
AU - Cavalcante, Fernanda Sampaio
AU - Rosado, Alexandre Soares
AU - Teixeira, Lúcia Martins
AU - Braga Oliveira, Queila
AU - Barcelos, Roberta
AU - Gleiser, Rogerio
AU - Santos, Henrique Fragoso
AU - dos Santos, Kátia Regina Netto
AU - Primo, Laura Guimarães
N1 - Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2021-02-16
PY - 2017/8/18
Y1 - 2017/8/18
N2 - Objective: This study investigated the presence of Enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth with primary root canal infections and related to the possible failure of pulpectomy outcome after 36 months. Material and methods: Root canal samples were obtained from 25 out of 244 patients using the sterile paper cone method. The identification of E. faecalis was done with culture and molecular tests using species-specific 16S rRNA gene-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR). After 36 months, the pulpectomy outcome was evaluated. Results:Enterococcus faecalis was found in five (20%) samples, and dental caries were the cause of primary infection in all of them. Pulpectomy outcome was evaluated only in teeth that completed the entire clinical protocol and were followed up to 36 months (n = 8). From these, 75% (n = 6) were successful and 25% (n = 2) failed. E. faecalis was present in 50% of both successful and failed cases. Conclusions:Enterococcus faecalis was not related to the failure of endodontic treatment of primary teeth.
AB - Objective: This study investigated the presence of Enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth with primary root canal infections and related to the possible failure of pulpectomy outcome after 36 months. Material and methods: Root canal samples were obtained from 25 out of 244 patients using the sterile paper cone method. The identification of E. faecalis was done with culture and molecular tests using species-specific 16S rRNA gene-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR). After 36 months, the pulpectomy outcome was evaluated. Results:Enterococcus faecalis was found in five (20%) samples, and dental caries were the cause of primary infection in all of them. Pulpectomy outcome was evaluated only in teeth that completed the entire clinical protocol and were followed up to 36 months (n = 8). From these, 75% (n = 6) were successful and 25% (n = 2) failed. E. faecalis was present in 50% of both successful and failed cases. Conclusions:Enterococcus faecalis was not related to the failure of endodontic treatment of primary teeth.
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00016357.2017.1328742
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020194466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00016357.2017.1328742
DO - 10.1080/00016357.2017.1328742
M3 - Article
SN - 1502-3850
VL - 75
SP - 423
EP - 428
JO - Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
IS - 6
ER -