TY - JOUR
T1 - Clownfish hosting anemones (Anthozoa, Actiniaria) of the Red Sea: new associations and distributions, historical misidentifications, and morphological variability
AU - Bennett-Smith, Morgan
AU - Majoris, John E.
AU - Titus, Benjamin M.
AU - Berumen, Michael L.
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2021-11-30
Acknowledgements: This study was funded by KAUST baseline research funds to MLB. Support for BMT was provided by a National Science Foundation grant (DEB-1934274).
PY - 2021/11/25
Y1 - 2021/11/25
N2 - Background: The Red Sea contains thousands of kilometers of fringing reef systems inhabited by clownfish and
sea anemones, yet there is no consensus regarding the diversity of host anemone species that inhabit this region.
We sought to clarify a historical record and recent literature sources that disagree on the diversity of host anemone
species in the Red Sea, which contains one endemic anemonefish, Amphiprion bicinctus Rüppell 1830.
Results: We conducted 73 surveys spanning ~ 1600 km of coastline from the northern Saudi Arabian Red Sea to
the Gulf of Aden and encountered seven species of host anemones, six of which hosted A. bicinctus. We revise the
list of symbionts for A. bicinctus to include Stichodactyla haddoni (Saville-Kent, 1893) and Stichodactyla mertensii
Brandt, 1835 which were both observed in multiple regions. We describe Red Sea phenotypic variability in
Heteractis crispa (Hemprich & Ehrenberg in Ehrenberg, 1834) and Heteractis aurora (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833), which
may indicate that these species hybridize in this region. We did not encounter Stichodactyla gigantea (Forsskål,
1775), although the Red Sea is the type locality for this species. Further, a thorough review of peer-reviewed
literature, occurrence records, and misidentified basis of record reports dating back to the early twentieth century
indicate that it is unlikely that S. gigantea occurs in the Red Sea.
Conclusions: In sum, we present a new guide for the host anemones of the Red Sea, revise the host specificity of
A. bicinctus, and question whether S. gigantea occurs in the central and western Indian Ocean.
AB - Background: The Red Sea contains thousands of kilometers of fringing reef systems inhabited by clownfish and
sea anemones, yet there is no consensus regarding the diversity of host anemone species that inhabit this region.
We sought to clarify a historical record and recent literature sources that disagree on the diversity of host anemone
species in the Red Sea, which contains one endemic anemonefish, Amphiprion bicinctus Rüppell 1830.
Results: We conducted 73 surveys spanning ~ 1600 km of coastline from the northern Saudi Arabian Red Sea to
the Gulf of Aden and encountered seven species of host anemones, six of which hosted A. bicinctus. We revise the
list of symbionts for A. bicinctus to include Stichodactyla haddoni (Saville-Kent, 1893) and Stichodactyla mertensii
Brandt, 1835 which were both observed in multiple regions. We describe Red Sea phenotypic variability in
Heteractis crispa (Hemprich & Ehrenberg in Ehrenberg, 1834) and Heteractis aurora (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833), which
may indicate that these species hybridize in this region. We did not encounter Stichodactyla gigantea (Forsskål,
1775), although the Red Sea is the type locality for this species. Further, a thorough review of peer-reviewed
literature, occurrence records, and misidentified basis of record reports dating back to the early twentieth century
indicate that it is unlikely that S. gigantea occurs in the Red Sea.
Conclusions: In sum, we present a new guide for the host anemones of the Red Sea, revise the host specificity of
A. bicinctus, and question whether S. gigantea occurs in the central and western Indian Ocean.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/673813
UR - https://mbr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41200-021-00216-6
U2 - 10.1186/s41200-021-00216-6
DO - 10.1186/s41200-021-00216-6
M3 - Article
SN - 1755-2672
VL - 14
JO - Marine Biodiversity Records
JF - Marine Biodiversity Records
IS - 1
ER -