TY - JOUR
T1 - Clustering algorithms to analyze molecular dynamics simulation trajectories for complex chemical and biological systems
AU - Peng, Jun-hui
AU - Wang, Wei
AU - Yu, Ye-qing
AU - Gu, Han-lin
AU - Huang, Xuhui
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledged KAUST grant number(s): OSR-2016-CRG5-3007
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (JCYJ20170413173837121), the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (HKUST C6009-15G, 14203915, 16302214, 16304215, 16318816, and AoE/P-705/16), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) (OSR-2016-CRG5-3007), Guangzhou Science Technology and Innovation Commission (201704030116), and Innovation and Technology Commission (ITCPD/17-9 and ITC-CNERC14SC01). X. Huang is the Padma Harilela Associate Professor of Science.
This publication acknowledges KAUST support, but has no KAUST affiliated authors.
PY - 2018/9/25
Y1 - 2018/9/25
N2 - Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become a powerful tool to investigate the structure-function relationship of proteins and other biological macromolecules at atomic resolution and biologically relevant timescales. MD simulations often produce massive datasets containing millions of snapshots describing proteins in motion. Therefore, clustering algorithms have been in high demand to be developed and applied to classify these MD snapshots and gain biological insights. There mainly exist two categories of clustering algorithms that aim to group protein conformations into clusters based on the similarity of their shape (geometric clustering) and kinetics (kinetic clustering). In this paper, we review a series of frequently used clustering algorithms applied in MD simulations, including divisive algorithms, agglomerative algorithms (single-linkage, complete-linkage, average-linkage, centroid-linkage and ward-linkage), center-based algorithms (K-Means, K-Medoids, K-Centers, and APM), density-based algorithms (neighbor-based, DBSCAN, density-peaks, and Robust-DB), and spectral-based algorithms (PCCA and PCCA+). In particular, differences between geometric and kinetic clustering metrics will be discussed along with the performances of different clustering algorithms. We note that there does not exist a one-size-fits-all algorithm in the classification of MD datasets. For a specific application, the right choice of clustering algorithm should be based on the purpose of clustering, and the intrinsic properties of the MD conformational ensembles. Therefore, a main focus of our review is to describe the merits and limitations of each clustering algorithm. We expect that this review would be helpful to guide researchers to choose appropriate clustering algorithms for their own MD datasets.
AB - Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become a powerful tool to investigate the structure-function relationship of proteins and other biological macromolecules at atomic resolution and biologically relevant timescales. MD simulations often produce massive datasets containing millions of snapshots describing proteins in motion. Therefore, clustering algorithms have been in high demand to be developed and applied to classify these MD snapshots and gain biological insights. There mainly exist two categories of clustering algorithms that aim to group protein conformations into clusters based on the similarity of their shape (geometric clustering) and kinetics (kinetic clustering). In this paper, we review a series of frequently used clustering algorithms applied in MD simulations, including divisive algorithms, agglomerative algorithms (single-linkage, complete-linkage, average-linkage, centroid-linkage and ward-linkage), center-based algorithms (K-Means, K-Medoids, K-Centers, and APM), density-based algorithms (neighbor-based, DBSCAN, density-peaks, and Robust-DB), and spectral-based algorithms (PCCA and PCCA+). In particular, differences between geometric and kinetic clustering metrics will be discussed along with the performances of different clustering algorithms. We note that there does not exist a one-size-fits-all algorithm in the classification of MD datasets. For a specific application, the right choice of clustering algorithm should be based on the purpose of clustering, and the intrinsic properties of the MD conformational ensembles. Therefore, a main focus of our review is to describe the merits and limitations of each clustering algorithm. We expect that this review would be helpful to guide researchers to choose appropriate clustering algorithms for their own MD datasets.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/629809
UR - http://cps.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1674-0068/31/cjcp1806147
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054039159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1674-0068/31/cjcp1806147
DO - 10.1063/1674-0068/31/cjcp1806147
M3 - Article
SN - 1674-0068
VL - 31
SP - 404
EP - 420
JO - Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics
JF - Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics
IS - 4
ER -