Co-benefits of and trade-offs between natural climate solutions and Sustainable Development Goals

Gaël Mariani*, Fabien Moullec, Trisha B. Atwood, Beverley Clarkson, Richard T. Conant, Leanne Cullen-Unsworth, Bronson Griscom, Julian Gutt, Jennifer Howard, Dorte Krause-Jensen, Sara M. Leavitt, Shing Yip Lee, Stephen J. Livesley, Peter I. Macreadie, Michael St-John, Chris Zganjar, William W.L. Cheung, Carlos M. Duarte, Yunne Jai Shin, Gerald G. SinghNicolas Loiseau, Marc Troussellier, David Mouillot

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Combating climate change and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are two important challenges facing humanity. Natural climate solutions (NCSs) can contribute to the achievement of these two commitments but can also generate conflicting trade-offs. Here, we reviewed the literature and drew on expert knowledge to assess the co-benefits of and trade-offs between 150 SDG targets and NCSs within 12 selected ecosystems. We demonstrate that terrestrial, coastal, and marine NCSs enable the attainment of different sets of SDG targets, with low redundancy. Implementing NCSs in various ecosystems would therefore maximize achievement of SDG targets but would also induce trade-offs, particularly if best practices are not followed. Reliance on NCSs at large scales will require that these trade-offs be taken into consideration to ensure the simultaneous realization of positive climate outcomes and multiple SDG targets for diverse stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2807
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume22
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Co-benefits of and trade-offs between natural climate solutions and Sustainable Development Goals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this