@inproceedings{6a50f807888d43f89f005dc2ca6c5c24,
title = "Comparing accessibility evaluation plug-ins",
abstract = "This article reports the results of a study comparing evaluation accessibility plugins extensions for the Chrome web browser. Eight of the most well-known tools among developers were chosen. All tools are free or available under an open-source license, and work with the Chrome browser. The tools were compared based on their feature set, their usability and their evaluation results of ten of the Alexa top websites. We found that individual tools still provide limited coverage of the success criteria; the coverage of success criteria varies quite a lot from evaluation engine to evaluation engine; what are the most and least covered success criteria in automated evaluations. After analysing the results, we highly recommend to use more than one tool (with a different engine) and to complement automated evaluation with manual checking.",
keywords = "accessibility, automatic, evaluation, tools",
author = "T{\^a}nia Fraz{\~a}o and Carlos Duarte",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Owner/Author.; 17th International Web for All Conference, W4A 2020 ; Conference date: 20-04-2020 Through 21-04-2020",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1145/3371300.3383346",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference, W4A 2020",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference, W4A 2020",
}