TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of multiple diagnostic techniques to study soot formation and morphology in a diffusion flame
AU - Kholghy, Mohammad Reza
AU - Afarin, Yashar
AU - Sediako, Anton D.
AU - Barba, Javier
AU - Lapuerta, Magín
AU - Chu, Carson
AU - Weingarten, Jason
AU - Borshanpour, Bobby
AU - Chernov, Victor
AU - Thomson, Murray J.
N1 - Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2023-09-23
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Different non-intrusive optical and intrusive non optical diagnostic methods are used to measure flame and soot properties in a laminar coflow diffusion flame in order to compare and analyze the sensitivity of each technique to soot particles with different age and morphology. Flame temperature is measured using rapid thermocouple insertion (RTI) method and also by measuring soot spectral emissions (SSE). Soot volume fraction (fv) is measured quantitatively with laser extinction (LE), time resolved laser induced incandescent (TiRe-LII) and SSE methods and qualitatively from the transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the thermophoretically sampled soot particles. Particle internal/aggregate nanostructure, and primary particle diameter are also analyzed based on TEM images from the sampled particles and TiRe-LII. It is shown that the optical methods are only sensitive to mature soot particles with solid appearance and cannot detect either temperature or fv in regions where liquid like nascent soot particles are dominant. fv measured by LE and TiRe-LII agree well while the values measured by SSE are lower. This discrepancy is attributed to the high sensitivity of fv measured by SSE to the measured temperature values. Temperature profiles measured by SSE are considerably higher than the values measured by RTI. It is shown that not considering the change of the surface emissivity of the thermocouple junction due to particle deposition for estimating radiation loss in regions where nascent or mature soot particles are dominant contributes to this discrepancy. Primary particle sizes measured based on TEM images and TiRe-LII agree reasonably well. Soot aggregate fractal dimension is shown to decrease as the soot particles age and become more mature.
AB - Different non-intrusive optical and intrusive non optical diagnostic methods are used to measure flame and soot properties in a laminar coflow diffusion flame in order to compare and analyze the sensitivity of each technique to soot particles with different age and morphology. Flame temperature is measured using rapid thermocouple insertion (RTI) method and also by measuring soot spectral emissions (SSE). Soot volume fraction (fv) is measured quantitatively with laser extinction (LE), time resolved laser induced incandescent (TiRe-LII) and SSE methods and qualitatively from the transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the thermophoretically sampled soot particles. Particle internal/aggregate nanostructure, and primary particle diameter are also analyzed based on TEM images from the sampled particles and TiRe-LII. It is shown that the optical methods are only sensitive to mature soot particles with solid appearance and cannot detect either temperature or fv in regions where liquid like nascent soot particles are dominant. fv measured by LE and TiRe-LII agree well while the values measured by SSE are lower. This discrepancy is attributed to the high sensitivity of fv measured by SSE to the measured temperature values. Temperature profiles measured by SSE are considerably higher than the values measured by RTI. It is shown that not considering the change of the surface emissivity of the thermocouple junction due to particle deposition for estimating radiation loss in regions where nascent or mature soot particles are dominant contributes to this discrepancy. Primary particle sizes measured based on TEM images and TiRe-LII agree reasonably well. Soot aggregate fractal dimension is shown to decrease as the soot particles age and become more mature.
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010218016303522
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051201685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.11.012
DO - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.11.012
M3 - Article
SN - 1556-2921
VL - 176
SP - 567
EP - 583
JO - Combustion and Flame
JF - Combustion and Flame
ER -