In the originally published article, Figures S1B, S4C, and S4F in the Supporting Information are incorrect. The corrected figures are shown below in full: S1 Figure (Figure presented.) XRD patterns of CN and PCN (A), of PCN, 0.4M/PCN, 0.6M/PCN, 0.8M/PCN and 1M/PCN (B), and of 0.8M/PCN, 2T/0.8M/PCN, 4T/0.8M/PCN, 6T/0.8M/PCN, 8T/0.8M/PCN and 1Au-6T/0.8M/PCN (C). T, M, and PCN mean TiO2, MnOx and porous CN, respectively. X in XM is the mass ratio percentage of KMnO4 to PCN, and Y in YT/0.8M/PCN is the mass ratio percentage of TiO2 to PCN. 1 in 1Au-T is the mass ratio percentage of Au to TiO2. It is the same unless stated elsewhere. S4 Figure (Figure presented.) XPS spectra of C1s (A), N1s (B), Mn2p (C), Ti2p (D), Au4f (E) and O1s (F) of CN, PCN, 0.8M/PCN, 6T/0.8M/PCN and 1Au-6T/0.8M/PCN. These errors do not affect the conclusions of the report. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Materials Science(all)