Corrigendum to “Methods of information theory and algorithmic complexity for network biology” (Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (2016) 51 (32–43)(S1084952116300118)(10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.011))

Hector Zenil; Narsis A. Kiani; Jesper Tegnér

doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.006

Corrigendum to “Methods of information theory and algorithmic complexity for network biology” (Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (2016) 51 (32–43)(S1084952116300118)(10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.011))

Hector Zenil^*, Narsis A. Kiani, Jesper Tegnér

^*Corresponding author for this work

Bioscience

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In Table 3 (of the said article) the following sentence should be disregarded as it does not belong to the table caption: “Calculation was done by comparing the top 10% of GSN with the predicted networks, with data with different levels of noise and missing values, with the SN2 data, including a negative feedback loop, and the SN3 (KEGG) data set. Values shown are average values over 30 networks.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	168
Number of pages	1
Journal	Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
Volume	60
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.006
State	Published - Dec 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Developmental Biology
Cell Biology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Methods of information theory and algorithmic complexity for network biology” (Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (2016) 51 (32–43)(S1084952116300118)(10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.011))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{1b1b3db15de54c67a5f7345e69938750,

title = "Corrigendum to “Methods of information theory and algorithmic complexity for network biology” (Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (2016) 51 (32–43)(S1084952116300118)(10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.011))",

abstract = "In Table 3 (of the said article) the following sentence should be disregarded as it does not belong to the table caption: “Calculation was done by comparing the top 10% of GSN with the predicted networks, with data with different levels of noise and missing values, with the SN2 data, including a negative feedback loop, and the SN3 (KEGG) data set. Values shown are average values over 30 networks.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.",

author = "Hector Zenil and Kiani, {Narsis A.} and Jesper Tegn{\'e}r",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.006",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "60",

pages = "168",

journal = "Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology",

issn = "1084-9521",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Corrigendum to “Methods of information theory and algorithmic complexity for network biology” (Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (2016) 51 (32–43)(S1084952116300118)(10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.011)). / Zenil, Hector; Kiani, Narsis A.; Tegnér, Jesper.
In: Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, Vol. 60, 01.12.2016, p. 168.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Methods of information theory and algorithmic complexity for network biology” (Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (2016) 51 (32–43)(S1084952116300118)(10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.011))

AU - Zenil, Hector

AU - Kiani, Narsis A.

AU - Tegnér, Jesper

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - In Table 3 (of the said article) the following sentence should be disregarded as it does not belong to the table caption: “Calculation was done by comparing the top 10% of GSN with the predicted networks, with data with different levels of noise and missing values, with the SN2 data, including a negative feedback loop, and the SN3 (KEGG) data set. Values shown are average values over 30 networks.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - In Table 3 (of the said article) the following sentence should be disregarded as it does not belong to the table caption: “Calculation was done by comparing the top 10% of GSN with the predicted networks, with data with different levels of noise and missing values, with the SN2 data, including a negative feedback loop, and the SN3 (KEGG) data set. Values shown are average values over 30 networks.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85004064253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.11.006

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 27979328

AN - SCOPUS:85004064253

SN - 1084-9521

VL - 60

SP - 168

JO - Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

JF - Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

ER -

Corrigendum to “Methods of information theory and algorithmic complexity for network biology” (Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology (2016) 51 (32–43)(S1084952116300118)(10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.011))

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this