Deep-ocean seaweed dumping for carbon sequestration: Questionable, risky, and not the best use of valuable biomass

Thierry Chopin*, Barry A. Costa-Pierce, Max Troell, Catriona L. Hurd, Mark John Costello, Steven Backman, Alejandro H. Buschmann, Russell Cuhel, Carlos M. Duarte, Fredrik Gröndahl, Kevin Heasman, Ricardo J. Haroun, Johan Johansen, Alexander Jueterbock, Mitchell Lench, Scott Lindell, Henrik Pavia, Aurora M. Ricart, Kristina S. Sundell, Charles Yarish

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Deep-ocean seaweed dumping is not an ecological, economical, or ethical answer to climate-change mitigation via carbon “sequestration.” Without sound science and sufficient knowledge on impacts to these fragile ecosystems, it distracts from more rational and effective blue-carbon interventions. We call for a moratorium on sinking seaweeds to deep-ocean ecosystems until its efficacy is established, and there is robust, evidence-based assessment of its environmental, economic, and societal sustainability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-364
Number of pages6
JournalOne Earth
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deep-ocean seaweed dumping for carbon sequestration: Questionable, risky, and not the best use of valuable biomass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this