TY - JOUR
T1 - Design, synthesis, chemical stability, packing, cyclic voltammetry, ionisation potential, and charge transport of [1]benzothieno[3,2-
T2 - B] [1]benzothiophene derivatives
AU - Ruzié, Christian
AU - Karpinska, Jolanta
AU - Laurent, Anne
AU - Sanguinet, Lionel
AU - Hunter, Simon
AU - Anthopoulos, Thomas D.
AU - Lemaur, Vincent
AU - Cornil, Jérôme
AU - Kennedy, Alan R.
AU - Fenwick, Oliver
AU - Samorì, Paolo
AU - Schweicher, Guillaume
AU - Chattopadhyay, Basab
AU - Geerts, Yves Henri
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Five new molecular semiconductors that differ from dioctylbenzothienobenzothiophene, by the introduction of ether or thioether side chains, have been synthesized and obtained in good yields. Their availability in sufficient quantities has allowed investigation of their electrochemical behaviour in solution and their electronic properties in solid state. Both ether and thioether compounds oxidise rather easily in solution, but nevertheless, they exhibit rather high ionisation potentials. This is a consequence of their crystal structure. Dioctylthioetherbenzothienobenzothiophene is rather sensitive to oxidation and degrades easily in close to ambient conditions. Dioctyletherbenzothienobenzothiophene is more stable. Its charge carrier mobility remains however rather moderate, on the order of 0.5 cm2 V-1 s-1, whereas that of dioctylbenzothienobenzothiophene reached 4 cm2 V-1 s-1, in the same conditions. The difference is explained by intrinsic factors as shown by a theoretical modelling.
AB - Five new molecular semiconductors that differ from dioctylbenzothienobenzothiophene, by the introduction of ether or thioether side chains, have been synthesized and obtained in good yields. Their availability in sufficient quantities has allowed investigation of their electrochemical behaviour in solution and their electronic properties in solid state. Both ether and thioether compounds oxidise rather easily in solution, but nevertheless, they exhibit rather high ionisation potentials. This is a consequence of their crystal structure. Dioctylthioetherbenzothienobenzothiophene is rather sensitive to oxidation and degrades easily in close to ambient conditions. Dioctyletherbenzothienobenzothiophene is more stable. Its charge carrier mobility remains however rather moderate, on the order of 0.5 cm2 V-1 s-1, whereas that of dioctylbenzothienobenzothiophene reached 4 cm2 V-1 s-1, in the same conditions. The difference is explained by intrinsic factors as shown by a theoretical modelling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973480502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c6tc01409g
DO - 10.1039/c6tc01409g
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84973480502
SN - 2050-7534
VL - 4
SP - 4863
EP - 4879
JO - JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
JF - JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
IS - 22
ER -