TY - JOUR
T1 - Direct comparison of logistic regression and recursive partitioning to predict chemotherapy response of breast cancer based on clinical pathological variables
AU - Rouzier, Roman
AU - Coutant, Charles
AU - Lesieur, Bénédicte
AU - Mazouni, Chafika
AU - Incitti, Roberto
AU - Natowicz, René
AU - Pusztai, Lajos
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - The purpose was to compare logistic regression model (LRM) and recursive partitioning (RP) to predict pathologic complete response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. The two models were built in a same training set of 496 patients and validated in a same validation set of 337 patients. Model performance was quantified with respect to discrimination (evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC)) and calibration. In the training set, AUC were similar for LRM and RP models (0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.80) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79), respectively) while LRM outperformed RP in the validation set (0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82) versus 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.67). LRM model also outperformed RP model in term of calibration. In these real datasets, LRM model outperformed RP model. It is therefore more suitable for clinical use.
AB - The purpose was to compare logistic regression model (LRM) and recursive partitioning (RP) to predict pathologic complete response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. The two models were built in a same training set of 496 patients and validated in a same validation set of 337 patients. Model performance was quantified with respect to discrimination (evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC)) and calibration. In the training set, AUC were similar for LRM and RP models (0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.80) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79), respectively) while LRM outperformed RP in the validation set (0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.82) versus 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.67). LRM model also outperformed RP model in term of calibration. In these real datasets, LRM model outperformed RP model. It is therefore more suitable for clinical use.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Logistic regression model
KW - Pathological complete response
KW - Prediction
KW - Recursive partitioning model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949118153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-009-0308-2
DO - 10.1007/s10549-009-0308-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 19152025
AN - SCOPUS:68949118153
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 117
SP - 325
EP - 331
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 2
ER -