TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficient NOMA Design without Channel Phase Information using Amplitude-Coherent Detection
AU - Al-Dweik, A.
AU - Iraqi, Y.
AU - Park, K.-H.
AU - Al-Jarrah, M.
AU - Alsusa, E.
AU - Alouini, Mohamed-Slim
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2021-10-15
Acknowledgements: The work of A. Al-Dweik was supported by Khalifa University Competitive Internal Research Award CIRA 2020-056.
The work of M. Al-Jarrah and E. Alsusa has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme under Grant agreement No 812991.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This paper presents the design and bit error rate (BER) analysis of a phase-independent non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system. The proposed NOMA system can utilize amplitude-coherent detection (ACD) which requires only the channel amplitude for equalization purposes. In what follows, three different designs for realizing the detection of the proposed NOMA are investigated. One is based on the maximum likelihood (ML) principle, while the other two are based on successive interference cancellation (SIC). Closed-form expressions for the BER of all detectors are derived and compared with the BER of the coherent ML detector. The obtained results, which are corroborated by simulations, demonstrate that, in most scenarios, the BER is dominated by multiuser interference rather than the absence of the channel phase information. Consequently, the BER using ML and ACD are comparable for various cases of interest. The paper also shows that the SIC detector is just an alternative approach to realize the ML detector, and hence, both detectors provide the same BER performance.
AB - This paper presents the design and bit error rate (BER) analysis of a phase-independent non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) system. The proposed NOMA system can utilize amplitude-coherent detection (ACD) which requires only the channel amplitude for equalization purposes. In what follows, three different designs for realizing the detection of the proposed NOMA are investigated. One is based on the maximum likelihood (ML) principle, while the other two are based on successive interference cancellation (SIC). Closed-form expressions for the BER of all detectors are derived and compared with the BER of the coherent ML detector. The obtained results, which are corroborated by simulations, demonstrate that, in most scenarios, the BER is dominated by multiuser interference rather than the absence of the channel phase information. Consequently, the BER using ML and ACD are comparable for various cases of interest. The paper also shows that the SIC detector is just an alternative approach to realize the ML detector, and hence, both detectors provide the same BER performance.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/672840
UR - https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9568858/
U2 - 10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3119368
DO - 10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3119368
M3 - Article
SN - 1558-0857
SP - 1
EP - 1
JO - IEEE Transactions on Communications
JF - IEEE Transactions on Communications
ER -