TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum: GABA-receptive microglia selectively sculpt developing inhibitory circuits (Cell (2021) 184(15) (4048–4063.e32), (S0092867421007534), (10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.018))
AU - Favuzzi, Emilia
AU - Huang, Shuhan
AU - Saldi, Giuseppe A.
AU - Binan, Loïc
AU - Ibrahim, Leena A.
AU - Fernández-Otero, Marian
AU - Cao, Yuqing
AU - Zeine, Ayman
AU - Sefah, Adwoa
AU - Zheng, Karen
AU - Xu, Qing
AU - Khlestova, Elizaveta
AU - Farhi, Samouil L.
AU - Bonneau, Richard
AU - Datta, Sandeep Robert
AU - Stevens, Beth
AU - Fishell, Gord
N1 - Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2022-09-13
PY - 2021/10/28
Y1 - 2021/10/28
N2 - (Cell 184, 4048–4063.e1–e32; July 22, 2021) It has come to our attention that, in the originally published version of our article examining how GABA-receptive microglia selectively regulate the development of inhibitory synapses in the mouse, Figure 1B had an accidental duplication of the data from the P4 samples instead of P8 (as indicated). The duplication occurred on a preliminary graph that initially contained data from all ages but was later split. We have now updated Figure 1B to reflect the correct data from the P8 experiments. The revised data do not change the conclusions or the interpretations of this experiment or the paper as a whole. This error has now been corrected in the article online, and the authors apologize for any confusion it may have caused. [Figure presented] [Figure presented]
AB - (Cell 184, 4048–4063.e1–e32; July 22, 2021) It has come to our attention that, in the originally published version of our article examining how GABA-receptive microglia selectively regulate the development of inhibitory synapses in the mouse, Figure 1B had an accidental duplication of the data from the P4 samples instead of P8 (as indicated). The duplication occurred on a preliminary graph that initially contained data from all ages but was later split. We have now updated Figure 1B to reflect the correct data from the P8 experiments. The revised data do not change the conclusions or the interpretations of this experiment or the paper as a whole. This error has now been corrected in the article online, and the authors apologize for any confusion it may have caused. [Figure presented] [Figure presented]
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867421011831
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117828010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 34715023
SN - 1097-4172
VL - 184
JO - Cell
JF - Cell
IS - 22
ER -