TY - JOUR
T1 - Geostatistical modeling to capture seismic-shaking patterns from earthquake-induced landslides
AU - Lombardo, Luigi
AU - Bakka, Haakon
AU - Tanyas, Hakan
AU - Westen, Cees
AU - Mai, Paul Martin
AU - Huser, Raphaël
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledgements: We thank Xu et al.(2014), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6, and Xu et al.(2015), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.002, for making their landslide inventories available. Also, we would like to thank the authors of Schmitt et al. (2017), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1064, and Tanyas et al.(2017), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JF004236, for their effort in collating and servicing the first open repository of global earthquake-induced landslides. The two ShakeMaps are available at the following links: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usp000g650#shakemap for Wenchuan and https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000gcdd#shakemap for Lushan.
PY - 2019/7/4
Y1 - 2019/7/4
N2 - We investigate earthquake-induced landslides using a geostatistical model featuring a latent spatial effect (LSE). The LSE represents the spatially structured residuals in the data, which remain after adjusting for covariate effects. To determine whether the LSE captures the residual signal from a given trigger, we test the LSE in reproducing the pattern of seismic shaking from the distribution of seismically induced landslides, without prior knowledge of the earthquake being included in the model. We assessed the landslide intensity, i.e., the expected number of landslides per mapping unit, for the area in which landslides triggered by the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes overlap. We examined this area to test our method on landslide inventories located in near and far fields of the earthquake. We generated three models for both earthquakes: i) seismic parameters only (proxy for the trigger); ii}) the LSE only; and iii) both seismic parameters and the LSE. The three configurations share the same morphometric covariates. This allowed us to study the LSE pattern and assess whether it approximated the seismic effects. Our results show that the LSE reproduced the shaking patterns for both earthquakes. In addition, the models including the LSE perform better than conventional models featuring seismic parameters only. Due to computational limitations we carried out a detailed analysis for a relatively small area (2112 km2), using a dataset with higher spatial resolution. Results were consistent with those of a subsequent analysis for a larger area (14648 km2) using coarser resolution data.
AB - We investigate earthquake-induced landslides using a geostatistical model featuring a latent spatial effect (LSE). The LSE represents the spatially structured residuals in the data, which remain after adjusting for covariate effects. To determine whether the LSE captures the residual signal from a given trigger, we test the LSE in reproducing the pattern of seismic shaking from the distribution of seismically induced landslides, without prior knowledge of the earthquake being included in the model. We assessed the landslide intensity, i.e., the expected number of landslides per mapping unit, for the area in which landslides triggered by the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes overlap. We examined this area to test our method on landslide inventories located in near and far fields of the earthquake. We generated three models for both earthquakes: i) seismic parameters only (proxy for the trigger); ii}) the LSE only; and iii) both seismic parameters and the LSE. The three configurations share the same morphometric covariates. This allowed us to study the LSE pattern and assess whether it approximated the seismic effects. Our results show that the LSE reproduced the shaking patterns for both earthquakes. In addition, the models including the LSE perform better than conventional models featuring seismic parameters only. Due to computational limitations we carried out a detailed analysis for a relatively small area (2112 km2), using a dataset with higher spatial resolution. Results were consistent with those of a subsequent analysis for a larger area (14648 km2) using coarser resolution data.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/656166
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019JF005056
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069926848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2019jf005056
DO - 10.1029/2019jf005056
M3 - Article
SN - 2169-9003
VL - 124
SP - 1958
EP - 1980
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
IS - 7
ER -