TY - JOUR
T1 - High pressure sorption of various hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide in Kimmeridge Blackstone and isolated kerogen
AU - Zhao, Huangjing
AU - Wu, Tianhao
AU - Firoozabadi, Abbas
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledgements: The work was supported by Saudi Aramco (Project code: RGC/3/2053-01-01) at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (Kaust). Their support is appreciated. We thank Dr. Zhehui Jin of the University of Alberta for part of the molecular simulations and Dr. Ali Dogru of Aramco for various technical discussions and support on the project.
This publication acknowledges KAUST support, but has no KAUST affiliated authors.
PY - 2018/3/20
Y1 - 2018/3/20
N2 - We have measured adsorption and desorption of methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane and carbon dioxide in Kimmeridge Blackstone at high pressures at temperatures of 60, 90 and 120 °C. Sorption of various light hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide in the isolated kerogen at 60 °C was also investigated. In our measurements, we used the gravimetric method. Physical and chemical properties of samples were measured to provide insight into sorption. Methane, ethane and carbon dioxide sorption was measured to 150 bar. Due to low vapor pressure of propane at 60 and 90 °C, the sorption was measured to 15 bar at 60 °C and 30 bar at 90 °C, respectively. At 120 °C, propane sorption was measured to 30 bar. Similarly, n-butane and iso-butane sorption was studied to 5, 9.5 and 15 bar at 60, 90 and 120 °C, respectively. Compared to sorption of these gases at moderate pressure in our recent work, high pressure sorption shows more pronounced hysteresis and non-monotonic excess sorption. In this work, we use the adsorbed layer density, estimated from grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations, and the liquid density to compute the absolute adsorption and examine the difference between the two. The results show that the absolute adsorption estimated with the two densities is significantly different in methane but similar in the other species. The butanes, n-butane and iso-butane, despite close bulk densities have very different adsorption. The adsorbed layer densities by GCMC simulations are different by about 10% which partly account for the adsorption difference. Other mechanisms may be at play due to different shape of the two molecules.
AB - We have measured adsorption and desorption of methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, iso-butane and carbon dioxide in Kimmeridge Blackstone at high pressures at temperatures of 60, 90 and 120 °C. Sorption of various light hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide in the isolated kerogen at 60 °C was also investigated. In our measurements, we used the gravimetric method. Physical and chemical properties of samples were measured to provide insight into sorption. Methane, ethane and carbon dioxide sorption was measured to 150 bar. Due to low vapor pressure of propane at 60 and 90 °C, the sorption was measured to 15 bar at 60 °C and 30 bar at 90 °C, respectively. At 120 °C, propane sorption was measured to 30 bar. Similarly, n-butane and iso-butane sorption was studied to 5, 9.5 and 15 bar at 60, 90 and 120 °C, respectively. Compared to sorption of these gases at moderate pressure in our recent work, high pressure sorption shows more pronounced hysteresis and non-monotonic excess sorption. In this work, we use the adsorbed layer density, estimated from grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations, and the liquid density to compute the absolute adsorption and examine the difference between the two. The results show that the absolute adsorption estimated with the two densities is significantly different in methane but similar in the other species. The butanes, n-butane and iso-butane, despite close bulk densities have very different adsorption. The adsorbed layer densities by GCMC simulations are different by about 10% which partly account for the adsorption difference. Other mechanisms may be at play due to different shape of the two molecules.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/629755
UR - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001623611830379X
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044166956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.186
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.186
M3 - Article
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 224
SP - 412
EP - 423
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
ER -