@inproceedings{b3f7f6a175624bd08d190cdf4b27d590,
title = "How to choose the best simulation for a specific purpose?",
abstract = "The decision on the fitness for purpose of a simulation should be based on the quantity of interest. However, in general, models are used because there is no complete experimental information available on the quantity of interest, so a direct judgement is not possible. The aim of this article is to put in light this dichotomy, and propose a methodology to decide if a simulation is fit for purpose, based on the experimental data available and an ensemble of simulations. The methodology is illustrated with one example of microscale simulations.",
keywords = "Air quality, Fit-for-purpose, Modelling, Validation",
author = "A. Martilli and Santiago, {J. L.} and Reisin, {T. G.} and A. Baklanov and J. Bartzis and R. Buccolieri and Costa, {A. M.} and {Di Sabatino}, S. and G. Efthimiou and J. Franke and A. Hellsten and R. Nuterman and R. Tavares",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
series = "HARMO 2011 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes",
publisher = "University of West Macedonia",
pages = "27--31",
editor = "Bartzis, {John G.} and Spyros Andronopoulos and Alexandros Syrakos",
booktitle = "HARMO 2011 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes",
note = "14th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, HARMO 2011 ; Conference date: 02-10-2011 Through 06-10-2011",
}