TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of AlphaFold on structure prediction of protein complexes
T2 - The CASP15-CAPRI experiment
AU - Lensink, Marc F.
AU - Brysbaert, Guillaume
AU - Raouraoua, Nessim
AU - Bates, Paul A.
AU - Giulini, Marco
AU - Honorato, Rodrigo V.
AU - van Noort, Charlotte
AU - Teixeira, Joao M.C.
AU - Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.
AU - Kong, Ren
AU - Shi, Hang
AU - Lu, Xufeng
AU - Chang, Shan
AU - Liu, Jian
AU - Guo, Zhiye
AU - Chen, Xiao
AU - Morehead, Alex
AU - Roy, Raj S.
AU - Wu, Tianqi
AU - Giri, Nabin
AU - Quadir, Farhan
AU - Chen, Chen
AU - Cheng, Jianlin
AU - Del Carpio, Carlos A.
AU - Ichiishi, Eichiro
AU - Rodriguez-Lumbreras, Luis A.
AU - Fernandez-Recio, Juan
AU - Harmalkar, Ameya
AU - Chu, Lee Shin
AU - Canner, Sam
AU - Smanta, Rituparna
AU - Gray, Jeffrey J.
AU - Li, Hao
AU - Lin, Peicong
AU - He, Jiahua
AU - Tao, Huanyu
AU - Huang, Sheng You
AU - Roel-Touris, Jorge
AU - Jimenez-Garcia, Brian
AU - Christoffer, Charles W.
AU - Jain, Anika J.
AU - Kagaya, Yuki
AU - Kannan, Harini
AU - Nakamura, Tsukasa
AU - Ricciardelli, Tiziana
AU - Barradas-Bautista, Didier
AU - Cao, Zhen
AU - Chawla, Mohit
AU - Cavallo, Luigi
AU - Oliva, Romina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - We present the results for CAPRI Round 54, the 5th joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round offered 37 targets, including 14 homodimers, 3 homo-trimers, 13 heterodimers including 3 antibody–antigen complexes, and 7 large assemblies. On average ~70 CASP and CAPRI predictor groups, including more than 20 automatics servers, submitted models for each target. A total of 21 941 models submitted by these groups and by 15 CAPRI scorer groups were evaluated using the CAPRI model quality measures and the DockQ score consolidating these measures. The prediction performance was quantified by a weighted score based on the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group among their five best models. Results show substantial progress achieved across a significant fraction of the 60+ participating groups. High-quality models were produced for about 40% of the targets compared to 8% two years earlier. This remarkable improvement is due to the wide use of the AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold2-Multimer software and the confidence metrics they provide. Notably, expanded sampling of candidate solutions by manipulating these deep learning inference engines, enriching multiple sequence alignments, or integration of advanced modeling tools, enabled top performing groups to exceed the performance of a standard AlphaFold2-Multimer version used as a yard stick. This notwithstanding, performance remained poor for complexes with antibodies and nanobodies, where evolutionary relationships between the binding partners are lacking, and for complexes featuring conformational flexibility, clearly indicating that the prediction of protein complexes remains a challenging problem.
AB - We present the results for CAPRI Round 54, the 5th joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round offered 37 targets, including 14 homodimers, 3 homo-trimers, 13 heterodimers including 3 antibody–antigen complexes, and 7 large assemblies. On average ~70 CASP and CAPRI predictor groups, including more than 20 automatics servers, submitted models for each target. A total of 21 941 models submitted by these groups and by 15 CAPRI scorer groups were evaluated using the CAPRI model quality measures and the DockQ score consolidating these measures. The prediction performance was quantified by a weighted score based on the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group among their five best models. Results show substantial progress achieved across a significant fraction of the 60+ participating groups. High-quality models were produced for about 40% of the targets compared to 8% two years earlier. This remarkable improvement is due to the wide use of the AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold2-Multimer software and the confidence metrics they provide. Notably, expanded sampling of candidate solutions by manipulating these deep learning inference engines, enriching multiple sequence alignments, or integration of advanced modeling tools, enabled top performing groups to exceed the performance of a standard AlphaFold2-Multimer version used as a yard stick. This notwithstanding, performance remained poor for complexes with antibodies and nanobodies, where evolutionary relationships between the binding partners are lacking, and for complexes featuring conformational flexibility, clearly indicating that the prediction of protein complexes remains a challenging problem.
KW - AlphaFold
KW - blind prediction
KW - CAPRI
KW - CASP
KW - deep learning
KW - protein assemblies
KW - protein complexes
KW - protein-protein interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175465612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/prot.26609
DO - 10.1002/prot.26609
M3 - Article
C2 - 37905971
AN - SCOPUS:85175465612
SN - 0887-3585
VL - 91
SP - 1658
EP - 1683
JO - Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
JF - Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics
IS - 12
ER -