TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementing and Innovating Marine Monitoring Approaches for Assessing Marine Environmental Status
AU - Danovaro, Roberto
AU - Carugati, Laura
AU - Berzano, Marco
AU - Cahill, Abigail E.
AU - Carvalho, Susana
AU - Chenuil, Anne
AU - Corinaldesi, Cinzia
AU - Cristina, Sonia
AU - David, Romain
AU - Dell'Anno, Antonio
AU - Dzhembekova, Nina
AU - Garcés, Esther
AU - Gasol, Joseph M.
AU - Goela, Priscila
AU - Féral, Jean-Pierre
AU - Ferrera, Isabel
AU - Forster, Rodney M.
AU - Kurekin, Andrey A.
AU - Rastelli, Eugenio
AU - Marinova, Veselka
AU - Miller, Peter I.
AU - Moncheva, Snejana
AU - Newton, Alice
AU - Pearman, John K.
AU - Pitois, Sophie G.
AU - Reñé, Albert
AU - Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, Naiara
AU - Saggiomo, Vincenzo
AU - Simis, Stefan G. H.
AU - Stefanova, Kremena
AU - Wilson, Christian
AU - Lo Martire, Marco
AU - Greco, Silvestro
AU - Cochrane, Sabine K. J.
AU - Mangoni, Olga
AU - Borja, Angel
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledgements: This manuscript is a result of DEVOTES (DEVelopment Of innovative Tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good Environmental Status) project, funded by the European Union under the 7th Framework Programme, “The Ocean of Tomorrow” Theme (grant agreement no. 308392) (http://www.devotes-project.eu). Further financial assistance was provided to VS and ER by the European Union under the ENPI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Programme (Sustainability and Tourism in the Mediterranean—S&T Med Strategic Project). The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union or of the Programme's management structures.
PY - 2016/11/23
Y1 - 2016/11/23
N2 - Marine environmental monitoring has tended to focus on site-specific methods of investigation. These traditional methods have low spatial and temporal resolution and are relatively labor intensive per unit area/time that they cover. To implement the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), European Member States are required to improve marine monitoring and design monitoring networks. This can be achieved by developing and testing innovative and cost-effective monitoring systems, as well as indicators of environmental status. Here, we present several recently developed methodologies and technologies to improve marine biodiversity indicators and monitoring methods. The innovative tools are discussed concerning the technologies presently utilized as well as the advantages and disadvantages of their use in routine monitoring. In particular, the present analysis focuses on: (i) molecular approaches, including microarray, Real Time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and metagenetic (metabarcoding) tools; (ii) optical (remote) sensing and acoustic methods; and (iii) in situ monitoring instruments. We also discuss their applications in marine monitoring within the MSFD through the analysis of case studies in order to evaluate their potential utilization in future routine marine monitoring. We show that these recently-developed technologies can present clear advantages in accuracy, efficiency and cost.
AB - Marine environmental monitoring has tended to focus on site-specific methods of investigation. These traditional methods have low spatial and temporal resolution and are relatively labor intensive per unit area/time that they cover. To implement the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), European Member States are required to improve marine monitoring and design monitoring networks. This can be achieved by developing and testing innovative and cost-effective monitoring systems, as well as indicators of environmental status. Here, we present several recently developed methodologies and technologies to improve marine biodiversity indicators and monitoring methods. The innovative tools are discussed concerning the technologies presently utilized as well as the advantages and disadvantages of their use in routine monitoring. In particular, the present analysis focuses on: (i) molecular approaches, including microarray, Real Time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and metagenetic (metabarcoding) tools; (ii) optical (remote) sensing and acoustic methods; and (iii) in situ monitoring instruments. We also discuss their applications in marine monitoring within the MSFD through the analysis of case studies in order to evaluate their potential utilization in future routine marine monitoring. We show that these recently-developed technologies can present clear advantages in accuracy, efficiency and cost.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/623713
UR - http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2016.00213/full
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008697505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2016.00213
DO - 10.3389/fmars.2016.00213
M3 - Article
SN - 2296-7745
VL - 3
JO - Frontiers in Marine Science
JF - Frontiers in Marine Science
IS - NOV
ER -