TY - GEN
T1 - Knock, Auto-Ignition and Pre-Ignition Tendency of Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE) with Ethanol Blends and Similar RON
AU - Singh, Eshan
AU - Dibble, Robert W.
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
Acknowledgements: The project is part of FUELCOM II. The authors acknowledge the funding agency Saudi Aramco for financial assistance. The authors thank Adrian Ichim, for his technical support in conducting experiments. The authors would like to thank the contribution of Monika Priyadarshini for Figure 11 of the manuscript.
PY - 2020/4/14
Y1 - 2020/4/14
N2 - Researchers have known about a higher pre-ignition frequency of alcohol fuels for several decades now. Several studies, assessing the effect of ethanol addition on stochastic pre-ignition, have shown contradicting observations. Researchers at FEV observed an increase in pre-ignition frequency with an increase in ethanol concentration, however the pre-ignition events at high ethanol content did not lead to super-knock. Most of the studies have used varying ethanol fraction in a common base-fuel, thereby varying the auto-ignition tendency of the blend. In the current study, the effect of ethanol addition on FACE (Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines) gasolines is assessed. Five different FACE gasolines (FACE A, C, I, J and G) were used for the study. Ignition delay time of varying ethanol fractions in FACE gasolines was measured in an Ignition Quality Tester (IQT), following ASTM 6890. The measurements showed that 13% ethanol (v/v) is needed for FACE A and C, while 27% ethanol (v/v) is needed for FACE I and J to match the ignition delay time of FACE G fuel. The five blends were tested in a Co-operative Fuel Research (CFR) engine in Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) and Spark Ignition (SI) combustion mode. The experiments showed similar auto-ignition and knocking tendency for the five blends. After that, the pre-ignition tendency of the blends was assessed in a supercharged AVL engine. In general, increasing ethanol content led to higher pre-ignition frequency. Moreover, the effect of ethanol on increasing pre-ignition frequency was dependent on the base-fuel into which ethanol was added. For the same ethanol fraction added, base-fuels with higher aromatic content showed higher pre-ignition frequency.
AB - Researchers have known about a higher pre-ignition frequency of alcohol fuels for several decades now. Several studies, assessing the effect of ethanol addition on stochastic pre-ignition, have shown contradicting observations. Researchers at FEV observed an increase in pre-ignition frequency with an increase in ethanol concentration, however the pre-ignition events at high ethanol content did not lead to super-knock. Most of the studies have used varying ethanol fraction in a common base-fuel, thereby varying the auto-ignition tendency of the blend. In the current study, the effect of ethanol addition on FACE (Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines) gasolines is assessed. Five different FACE gasolines (FACE A, C, I, J and G) were used for the study. Ignition delay time of varying ethanol fractions in FACE gasolines was measured in an Ignition Quality Tester (IQT), following ASTM 6890. The measurements showed that 13% ethanol (v/v) is needed for FACE A and C, while 27% ethanol (v/v) is needed for FACE I and J to match the ignition delay time of FACE G fuel. The five blends were tested in a Co-operative Fuel Research (CFR) engine in Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) and Spark Ignition (SI) combustion mode. The experiments showed similar auto-ignition and knocking tendency for the five blends. After that, the pre-ignition tendency of the blends was assessed in a supercharged AVL engine. In general, increasing ethanol content led to higher pre-ignition frequency. Moreover, the effect of ethanol on increasing pre-ignition frequency was dependent on the base-fuel into which ethanol was added. For the same ethanol fraction added, base-fuels with higher aromatic content showed higher pre-ignition frequency.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/663429
UR - https://www.sae.org/content/2020-01-0613/
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083829719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4271/2020-01-0613
DO - 10.4271/2020-01-0613
M3 - Conference contribution
BT - SAE Technical Paper Series
PB - SAE International
ER -