Modeling of spatial extremes in environmental data science: Time to move away from max-stable processes

Raphaël Huser*, Thomas Opitz, Jennifer L. Wadsworth

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Environmental data science for spatial extremes has traditionally relied heavily on max-stable processes. Even though the popularity of these models has perhaps peaked with statisticians, they are still perceived and considered as the state of the art in many applied fields. However, while the asymptotic theory supporting the use of max-stable processes is mathematically rigorous and comprehensive, we think that it has also been overused, if not misused, in environmental applications, to the detriment of more purposeful and meticulously validated models. In this article, we review the main limitations of max-stable process models, and strongly argue against their systematic use in environmental studies. Alternative solutions based on more flexible frameworks using the exceedances of variables above appropriately chosen high thresholds are discussed, and an outlook on future research is given. We consider the opportunities offered by hybridizing machine learning with extreme-value statistics, highlighting seven key recommendations moving forward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere3
JournalEnvironmental Data Science
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2025

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • block maxima
  • extreme-value theory
  • machine learning
  • peaks-over-threshold approach
  • spatial process
  • stochastic process
  • tail dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Statistics and Probability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling of spatial extremes in environmental data science: Time to move away from max-stable processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this