TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of different hollow fiber membranes for seawater desalination using membrane distillation
AU - Francis, Lijo
AU - Ghaffour, NorEddine
AU - Alsaadi, Ahmad Salem
AU - Amy, Gary L.
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
PY - 2014/8/11
Y1 - 2014/8/11
N2 - Membrane distillation requires a highly porous hydrophobic membrane with low surface energy. In this paper, we compare the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performances of four different types of in-house fabricated hollow fiber membranes and two different commercially available hollow fiber membranes. Hollow fiber membranes are fabricated using wet-jet phase inversion technique and the polymeric matrices used for the fabrication are polyvinylidine fluoride (PVDF) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Commercial hollow fiber membrane materials are made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polypropylene (PP). PVDF hollow fibers showed a superior performance among all the hollow fibers tested in the DCMD process and gave a water vapor flux of 31 kg m-2h-1 at a feed and coolant inlet temperatures of 80 and 20°C, respectively. Under the same conditions, the water vapor flux observed for PP, PTFE, and PVC hollow fiber membranes are 13, 11, and 6 kg m-2h-1, respectively, with 99.99% salt rejection observed for all membranes used.
AB - Membrane distillation requires a highly porous hydrophobic membrane with low surface energy. In this paper, we compare the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performances of four different types of in-house fabricated hollow fiber membranes and two different commercially available hollow fiber membranes. Hollow fiber membranes are fabricated using wet-jet phase inversion technique and the polymeric matrices used for the fabrication are polyvinylidine fluoride (PVDF) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Commercial hollow fiber membrane materials are made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polypropylene (PP). PVDF hollow fibers showed a superior performance among all the hollow fibers tested in the DCMD process and gave a water vapor flux of 31 kg m-2h-1 at a feed and coolant inlet temperatures of 80 and 20°C, respectively. Under the same conditions, the water vapor flux observed for PP, PTFE, and PVC hollow fiber membranes are 13, 11, and 6 kg m-2h-1, respectively, with 99.99% salt rejection observed for all membranes used.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/566146
UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19443994.2014.946723
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940452850&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19443994.2014.946723
DO - 10.1080/19443994.2014.946723
M3 - Article
SN - 1944-3994
VL - 55
SP - 2786
EP - 2791
JO - Desalination and Water Treatment
JF - Desalination and Water Treatment
IS - 10
ER -