TY - JOUR
T1 - Pragmatic aspects of uncertainty propagation: A conceptual review
AU - Thacker, W.Carlisle
AU - Iskandarani, Mohamad
AU - Gonçalves, Rafael C.
AU - Srinivasan, Ashwanth
AU - Knio, Omar
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
PY - 2015/9/12
Y1 - 2015/9/12
N2 - When quantifying the uncertainty of the response of a computationally costly oceanographic or meteorological model stemming from the uncertainty of its inputs, practicality demands getting the most information using the fewest simulations. It is widely recognized that, by interpolating the results of a small number of simulations, results of additional simulations can be inexpensively approximated to provide a useful estimate of the variability of the response. Even so, as computing the simulations to be interpolated remains the biggest expense, the choice of these simulations deserves attention. When making this choice, two requirement should be considered: (i) the nature of the interpolation and ii) the available information about input uncertainty. Examples comparing polynomial interpolation and Gaussian process interpolation are presented for three different views of input uncertainty.
AB - When quantifying the uncertainty of the response of a computationally costly oceanographic or meteorological model stemming from the uncertainty of its inputs, practicality demands getting the most information using the fewest simulations. It is widely recognized that, by interpolating the results of a small number of simulations, results of additional simulations can be inexpensively approximated to provide a useful estimate of the variability of the response. Even so, as computing the simulations to be interpolated remains the biggest expense, the choice of these simulations deserves attention. When making this choice, two requirement should be considered: (i) the nature of the interpolation and ii) the available information about input uncertainty. Examples comparing polynomial interpolation and Gaussian process interpolation are presented for three different views of input uncertainty.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/577255
UR - http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1463500315001596
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945185360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.09.001
M3 - Article
SN - 1463-5003
VL - 95
SP - 25
EP - 36
JO - Ocean Modelling
JF - Ocean Modelling
ER -