Seat biases of apportionment methods under general distributional assumptions

Udo Schwingenschloegl

doi:10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.005

Seat biases of apportionment methods under general distributional assumptions

Udo Schwingenschloegl^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Physical Sciences and Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Apportionment methods round vote proportions to integer numbers of seats in parliament. Seat biases of an apportionment method are expected differences between the seats actually apportioned to the parties and their ideal fractional shares of seats. In this letter it is shown that, for many popular apportionment methods, asymptotic seat biases for an increasing number of seats in parliament do not depend on the distributional assumption for the vote counts.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-3
Number of pages	3
Journal	Applied Mathematics Letters
Volume	21
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.005
State	Published - Jan 1 2008

Keywords

Apportionment method
Hamilton method
Rounding method
Seat bias
Stationary divisor methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Computational Mechanics
Control and Systems Engineering
Applied Mathematics
Numerical Analysis

Access to Document

10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.005

Cite this

@article{81a76713c80344598c457220ade4780d,

title = "Seat biases of apportionment methods under general distributional assumptions",

abstract = "Apportionment methods round vote proportions to integer numbers of seats in parliament. Seat biases of an apportionment method are expected differences between the seats actually apportioned to the parties and their ideal fractional shares of seats. In this letter it is shown that, for many popular apportionment methods, asymptotic seat biases for an increasing number of seats in parliament do not depend on the distributional assumption for the vote counts.",

keywords = "Apportionment method, Hamilton method, Rounding method, Seat bias, Stationary divisor methods",

author = "Udo Schwingenschloegl",

year = "2008",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.005",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "21",

pages = "1--3",

journal = "Applied Mathematics Letters",

issn = "0893-9659",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seat biases of apportionment methods under general distributional assumptions

AU - Schwingenschloegl, Udo

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Apportionment methods round vote proportions to integer numbers of seats in parliament. Seat biases of an apportionment method are expected differences between the seats actually apportioned to the parties and their ideal fractional shares of seats. In this letter it is shown that, for many popular apportionment methods, asymptotic seat biases for an increasing number of seats in parliament do not depend on the distributional assumption for the vote counts.

AB - Apportionment methods round vote proportions to integer numbers of seats in parliament. Seat biases of an apportionment method are expected differences between the seats actually apportioned to the parties and their ideal fractional shares of seats. In this letter it is shown that, for many popular apportionment methods, asymptotic seat biases for an increasing number of seats in parliament do not depend on the distributional assumption for the vote counts.

KW - Apportionment method

KW - Hamilton method

KW - Rounding method

KW - Seat bias

KW - Stationary divisor methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36248939127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36248939127

SN - 0893-9659

VL - 21

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Applied Mathematics Letters

JF - Applied Mathematics Letters

IS - 1

ER -

Seat biases of apportionment methods under general distributional assumptions

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this