TY - JOUR
T1 - Seaweed forests are carbon sinks that may help mitigate CO2 emissions: a comment on Gallagher et al. (2022)
AU - Filbee-Dexter, Karen
AU - Pessarrodona, Albert
AU - Duarte, Carlos M.
AU - Krause-Jensen, Dorte
AU - Hancke, Kasper
AU - Smale, Daniel
AU - Wernberg, Thomas
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2023-07-31
Acknowledgements: KFD and TW were supported by the Australian Research Council (DE1901006192 to KFD; LP190100346 and DP220100650 to KFD and TW, respectively). KFD, KH and TW were supported by the Norwegian Blue Forest Network and KH by the Norwegian Institute for Water Research. DKJ acknowledges support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark (8021–00222 B, CARMA) and from the European Union Horizon 2020 program (FutureMARES, contract #869300). DAS was supported by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/S032827/1).
PY - 2023/7/6
Y1 - 2023/7/6
N2 - Recently, Gallagher et al. (2022) suggested that seaweed ecosystems are net heterotrophic carbon sources due to CO2 released from the consumption of external subsidies. Here we outline several flaws in their argument, which we believe confuse research on the blue carbon potential of seaweed ecosystems, and unjustifiably generate doubt around initiatives to protect and restore seaweed forests. Gallagher et al.’s evidence relies on 18 studies with highly variable measures of net ecosystem production, which do not statistically support their conclusion that most seaweed ecosystems are heterotrophic. This dataset is also inappropriate as it is incomplete and misrepresents seaweed ecosystems globally, particularly seaweed forests, which contribute disproportionately to global seaweed productivity. We maintain that the climate change mitigation value of an ecosystem depends on the net difference in CO2 uptake between the original ecosystem and its replacement ecosystem. We provide evidence that most seaweed ecosystems, which drawdown the largest carbon flux of any vegetated coastal habitat, are indeed net autotrophic ecosystems. We recognize that substantial uncertainties remain concerning the magnitude of CO2 drawdown by seaweed ecosystems and recommend that carbon fluxes around seaweed ecosystems should be considered more broadly and taken into account in estimates of their CO2 mitigation potential.
AB - Recently, Gallagher et al. (2022) suggested that seaweed ecosystems are net heterotrophic carbon sources due to CO2 released from the consumption of external subsidies. Here we outline several flaws in their argument, which we believe confuse research on the blue carbon potential of seaweed ecosystems, and unjustifiably generate doubt around initiatives to protect and restore seaweed forests. Gallagher et al.’s evidence relies on 18 studies with highly variable measures of net ecosystem production, which do not statistically support their conclusion that most seaweed ecosystems are heterotrophic. This dataset is also inappropriate as it is incomplete and misrepresents seaweed ecosystems globally, particularly seaweed forests, which contribute disproportionately to global seaweed productivity. We maintain that the climate change mitigation value of an ecosystem depends on the net difference in CO2 uptake between the original ecosystem and its replacement ecosystem. We provide evidence that most seaweed ecosystems, which drawdown the largest carbon flux of any vegetated coastal habitat, are indeed net autotrophic ecosystems. We recognize that substantial uncertainties remain concerning the magnitude of CO2 drawdown by seaweed ecosystems and recommend that carbon fluxes around seaweed ecosystems should be considered more broadly and taken into account in estimates of their CO2 mitigation potential.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/693325
UR - https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsad107/7220133
U2 - 10.1093/icesjms/fsad107
DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fsad107
M3 - Article
SN - 1095-9289
JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science
JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science
ER -