Subjective and objective evaluation of chest imaging systems

F. R. Verdun; F. Bochud; C. Depeursinge; L. Desponds; M. Grecescu; C. Hessler; S. Raimondi; J. F. Valley

doi:10.1093/rpd/49.1-3.91

Subjective and objective evaluation of chest imaging systems

F. R. Verdun^*, F. Bochud, C. Depeursinge, L. Desponds, M. Grecescu, C. Hessler, S. Raimondi, J. F. Valley

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

For a user facing the task of choosing a new radiological material, it is important to define a standard procedure to make comparisons. To do so there are two different philosophies. On the one hand, one can perform a subjective test using an anthropomorphic phantom, and on the other hand one can define an objective test to quantify the notion of quality. These two different techniques have been used to rank 23 screen-film combinations for chest imaging.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	91-94
Number of pages	4
Journal	Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume	49
Issue number	1-3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/49.1-3.91
State	Published - 1993
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Radiation
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1093/rpd/49.1-3.91

Cite this

@article{52ffd894aaa94ebdb7191eb9e9355c4b,

title = "Subjective and objective evaluation of chest imaging systems",

abstract = "For a user facing the task of choosing a new radiological material, it is important to define a standard procedure to make comparisons. To do so there are two different philosophies. On the one hand, one can perform a subjective test using an anthropomorphic phantom, and on the other hand one can define an objective test to quantify the notion of quality. These two different techniques have been used to rank 23 screen-film combinations for chest imaging.",

author = "Verdun, {F. R.} and F. Bochud and C. Depeursinge and L. Desponds and M. Grecescu and C. Hessler and S. Raimondi and Valley, {J. F.}",

year = "1993",

doi = "10.1093/rpd/49.1-3.91",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "49",

pages = "91--94",

journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",

issn = "0144-8420",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subjective and objective evaluation of chest imaging systems

AU - Verdun, F. R.

AU - Bochud, F.

AU - Depeursinge, C.

AU - Desponds, L.

AU - Grecescu, M.

AU - Hessler, C.

AU - Raimondi, S.

AU - Valley, J. F.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - For a user facing the task of choosing a new radiological material, it is important to define a standard procedure to make comparisons. To do so there are two different philosophies. On the one hand, one can perform a subjective test using an anthropomorphic phantom, and on the other hand one can define an objective test to quantify the notion of quality. These two different techniques have been used to rank 23 screen-film combinations for chest imaging.

AB - For a user facing the task of choosing a new radiological material, it is important to define a standard procedure to make comparisons. To do so there are two different philosophies. On the one hand, one can perform a subjective test using an anthropomorphic phantom, and on the other hand one can define an objective test to quantify the notion of quality. These two different techniques have been used to rank 23 screen-film combinations for chest imaging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027487064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/49.1-3.91

DO - 10.1093/rpd/49.1-3.91

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027487064

SN - 0144-8420

VL - 49

SP - 91

EP - 94

JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

IS - 1-3

ER -

Subjective and objective evaluation of chest imaging systems

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this