TY - JOUR
T1 - The consistent acceleration of lifted objects: Implications for kinesthetic illusions and the perception of weight
AU - Roberts, William L.
AU - Davis, Christopher M.
N1 - Generated from Scopus record by KAUST IRTS on 2023-09-20
PY - 1978/1/1
Y1 - 1978/1/1
N2 - In examining films of lifting movements in a study of the size-weight illusion (Davis and Roberts, 1976), a consistency was noted in the values obtained for the maximum accelerations of the objects lifted. While at first surprising, this finding can be embedded significantly in theories relating to kinesthetic illusions and the perception of weight and to theories on the control of general physical movement. This study was designed to confirm its existence. Twenty-four subjects were filmed lifting four objects differing in size, shape, substance, color, and weight. The film was analyzed frame-by-frame and the data were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance. Subjects, while differing from one another, were consistent in the maximum accelerations they applied to the three heaviest of the four objects. The accelerations of the lightest object differed significantly from the accelerations of the other three, but it seems likely that this was due to the experimental task itself. © 1978, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
AB - In examining films of lifting movements in a study of the size-weight illusion (Davis and Roberts, 1976), a consistency was noted in the values obtained for the maximum accelerations of the objects lifted. While at first surprising, this finding can be embedded significantly in theories relating to kinesthetic illusions and the perception of weight and to theories on the control of general physical movement. This study was designed to confirm its existence. Twenty-four subjects were filmed lifting four objects differing in size, shape, substance, color, and weight. The film was analyzed frame-by-frame and the data were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance. Subjects, while differing from one another, were consistent in the maximum accelerations they applied to the three heaviest of the four objects. The accelerations of the lightest object differed significantly from the accelerations of the other three, but it seems likely that this was due to the experimental task itself. © 1978, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222895.1978.10735162
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346018735&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00222895.1978.10735162
DO - 10.1080/00222895.1978.10735162
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-2895
VL - 10
SP - 287
EP - 293
JO - Journal of Motor Behavior
JF - Journal of Motor Behavior
IS - 4
ER -