TY - JOUR
T1 - The performance of a temperature cascaded cogeneration system producing steam, cooling and dehumidification
AU - Myat, Aung
AU - Thu, Kyaw
AU - Kim, Youngdeuk
AU - Ng, K. C.
N1 - KAUST Repository Item: Exported on 2020-10-01
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - This paper discusses the performance of a temperature-cascaded cogeneration plant (TCCP), equipped with an efficient waste heat recovery system. The TCCP, also called a cogeneration system, produces four types of useful energy-namely, (i) electricity, (ii) steam, (iii) cooling and (iv) dehumidification-by utilizing single fuel source. The TCCP comprises a Capstone C-30 micro-turbine that generates nominal capacity of 26 kW of electricity, a compact and efficient waste heat recovery system and a host of waste-heat-activated devices, namely (i) a steam generator, (ii) an absorption chiller, (iii) an adsorption chiller and (iv) a multi-bed desiccant dehumidifier. The performance analysis was conducted under different operation conditions such as different exhaust gas temperatures. It was observed that energy utilization factor could be as high as 70% while fuel energy saving ratio was found to be 28%. © 2013 Desalination Publications.
AB - This paper discusses the performance of a temperature-cascaded cogeneration plant (TCCP), equipped with an efficient waste heat recovery system. The TCCP, also called a cogeneration system, produces four types of useful energy-namely, (i) electricity, (ii) steam, (iii) cooling and (iv) dehumidification-by utilizing single fuel source. The TCCP comprises a Capstone C-30 micro-turbine that generates nominal capacity of 26 kW of electricity, a compact and efficient waste heat recovery system and a host of waste-heat-activated devices, namely (i) a steam generator, (ii) an absorption chiller, (iii) an adsorption chiller and (iv) a multi-bed desiccant dehumidifier. The performance analysis was conducted under different operation conditions such as different exhaust gas temperatures. It was observed that energy utilization factor could be as high as 70% while fuel energy saving ratio was found to be 28%. © 2013 Desalination Publications.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10754/562642
UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19443994.2012.694232
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875796642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19443994.2012.694232
DO - 10.1080/19443994.2012.694232
M3 - Article
SN - 1944-3994
VL - 51
SP - 1915
EP - 1921
JO - Desalination and Water Treatment
JF - Desalination and Water Treatment
IS - 7-9
ER -